www.idoc.state.il.us
S.A. Godinez, Director

Pat Quinn, Governor

Agency Links Skip to Content

Director
IDOC Overview
IDOC Annual Report
Inmate Search
Facilities
Visitation Rules
FAQ
Attorney FAQ
Contact Us
Jobs @ IDOC
Reports & Stats

Eligibility Criteria Supervised Electronic Detention

MGT/SMGT Impact List

Sex Registrant Search
Community Notification of Inmate Early Release
IDOC News
Industries
Victim Services
Wanted Fugitives
IDOC Advisory Board
Adult Redeploy IL Oversight Board
RANA Task Force
Employee Cost - Savings Suggestion Program
Employee Benefits Information
Illinois Department of Juvenile Justice
IDOC Home
Illinois Home
[Search Tips]

  Part I: Impact on the Population 

diagonal image

Summary

Part I presents sentencing and population data to demonstrate how sentencing practices and statutory revisions contribute to the growth of Illinois' prison population. At the end of 1977, the population was 10,982. The December 31, 2002 population reached 42,693, an annual growth rate of 5.6% since 1977.

This expansion in the number of inmates has been largely a consequence of the number and length of Murder, Class X, and Class 1 sentences imposed since determinate sentencing began in 1978. The volume of admissions for these mostly violent offenders, whose relatively longer sentences hold them in prison for an extensive period of time, has resulted in an accumulation of inmates within the prison system. However, the recent prison population decline has been attributed, among other reasons, to a higher proportion of admissions for offenders sentenced from court for the lower classes of offenses. These Class 3 and Class 4 offenders typically have short lengths of stay, resulting in a faster movement of inmates through the system, and consequently, a waning prison population.

Those inmates with a life sentence, habitual child sex offenders and child sex offenders, and indeterminate inmates who remain incarcerated also contribute to the expansion in population. In addition, the sheer volume of drug offenders sentenced to prison each year, particularly for Possession of a Controlled Substance, continues to contribute to the growth in the prison population.

Detailed impacts on the prison population as a result of recent sentencing practices in Illinois are explained in Part I.


Prison Population

Table 1 and Figure 1 illustrate prison population growth since 1970. The acceleration that began in 1974 is attributed to more felons being sentenced to prison with longer sentences. The expansion in the prison population continued after 1978 with the enactment of determinate sentencing. Growth slowed in the early 1980's when the Illinois Department of Corrections (IDOC) utilized a forced release policy. A significant rise began again once forced release ended in 1983.

From 1988 to 1994 the prison population increased by 73.3%. Between 1994 and 2000 the prison population had an annual growth rate of 3.6%. Over the next two years, however, the population decreased by 2,588 inmates, a decline of 5.7%. This decline is attributed, among other reasons, to an increase in the number of Class 3 and Class 4 admissions. In recent years, a higher proportion of inmates are being sentenced to prison with shorter sentences; consequently, instead of detaining more long-term inmates, IDOC has been going through a period in which inmates with shorter lengths of stay are advancing more rapidly through the prison system.



Violent Offenders, Drug Offenders, and Females in the Prison Population

Many factors contribute to a changing prison population. Inmates serving a sentence for violent crimes remain incarcerated longer than offenders committing property or drug crimes. Between 1993 and 2000, there had been a gradual rise in violent offenders sentenced to prison (Figure 2). This number fell by 432 in 2001, then by another 496 in 2002. Despite recent declines, their extensive incarcerations contribute to Illinois' prison population growth.

The number of drug offenders in Illinois' prison system fell by 693 (6.0%) during 2002 (Figure 3). Since 1993, however, this population has experienced an overall growth of 57.2%. The most significant increases during this ten-year period took place for Class 4 Possession of a Controlled Substance, Class 2 Manufacture or Delivery of a Controlled Substance, and Delivery of Controlled Substances to a Person Under 18 or in Specified Places.

The female population has accelerated at more than twice the rate of the male population since 1993 (Figure 4). At the end of 2002, there were 2,520 women incarcerated. Despite another decline in 2002, this population has increased by 49.3% over the ten-year period. Female inmates are housed at the Dwight Correctional Center, which includes the Kankakee Minimum Security Unit, and at the Lincoln and Decatur Correctional Centers as well as the Dixon Springs Impact Incarceration Program (IIP). Female inmates also reside in the Fox Valley Adult Transition Center.


 

Impact of Determinate Sentencing

Despite recent declines, the overall growth in the number of violent offenders since 1977, many of whom have been convicted of Class X crimes, as well as in the number of drug offenders, has been a consequence of determinate sentencing (refer to Appendix B for an explanation of determinate sentencing). Determinate sentencing has resulted in an increase in the number of inmates in the prison population, as the rate of movement through the prison system to release has slowed.

Table 2 demonstrates that the number of inmates incarcerated for the most serious crimes, which consist of Murder as well as Class X and Class 1 felonies, has increased by 21,314 since 1977 (the year prior to determinate sentencing). Proportionately, these habitually violent criminals and long-term drug offenders comprised less than 37% of the prison population in 1977. By the end of 2002, Murder, Class X, and Class 1 offenders represented 59.1% of all inmates.

Among the lower class offenses, the dominance of Class 2 offenders in the prison population is seen in Table 2. These property and drug offenders made up over 21% of the population. In addition, the increase in the use of incarceration for Class 4 offenders is noted by the growth of these offenders in the prison population from 1977 to 2002.


 

Prison Population by Offense Type

Offenses are categorized into groups consisting of crimes against a person, property crimes, drug offenses, sex crimes, and other miscellaneous crimes. Generally, crimes against a person and sex offenses are classified together as "violent crimes."

Table 3 and Figure 5 illustrate the increasing prison population within each of these five classifications over the past ten years. Since 1993, the number of offenders sentenced to prison for crimes against a person expanded by 2,544, a 16.3% increase. The number of sex offenders in prison has risen by 27.0%, while offenders with property crimes grew by 8.3%. The largest increase is in the number of drug offenders, growing by 57.3% during this time period.

The majority of inmates in prison continue to be those convicted of violent crimes. The total number of inmates who were sentenced for a crime against a person or a sex offense comprised 51.9% of the prison population at the end of 2002. Additionally, one of every four inmates is serving a holding sentence for a drug offense.




 

Impact of Determinate Sentencing on Length of Stay

Serious offenders are also serving more time in prison. Since 1978, the average length of stay for an inmate convicted of Murder has risen by 2.8 years. Class X inmates released during 2002 served over 14 months longer than inmates released in 1978 with a comparable indeterminate sentence. Conversely, inmates released in 2002 for felonies in other offense classes served less time on average than those released during 1978.



Time Served and Projected Time to Serve for Determinate Cases

Inmates with a determinate sentence who are currently in prison, excluding the community supervision violators, have an average of 4.7 years left to serve after serving 3.1 years so far. Of the 6,895 murderers, 5,818 do not have a life or death sentence and will be in prison for an average of 14.5 additional years. Furthermore, Class X offenders will be in prison for an average of 6.1 more years. The inmates serving a prison sentence for the lower offense classes have less time to serve, as noted in Table 5 and Figure 6.

Accordingly, as large numbers of serious, long-term offenders are added to the prison population, with fewer released, there will continue to be an accumulation of these inmates in prison.


Sentences Imposed, Admissions, Exits, and Population by Offense Type

Data that support why violent offenders comprise the largest percentage of the population are presented in Table 6. Violent offenders constitute 23.4% of all sentences imposed, 23.7% of all admissions, and 23.9% of all exits. Yet, as a consequence of their relatively longer lengths of stay, as evidenced by an average sentence (7.4 years) more than twice as long as those in the other offense categories, violent offenders are the most populous group (51.4%) in the prison system.

Conversely, property and drug offenders serve relatively less time in prison and, therefore, comprise a smaller proportion of inmates. Although about one-third of sentences imposed and just over 30% of admissions and exits are for property offenders, their shorter prison stays indicate that these inmates would not accumulate in the population. Despite the fact that property offenders constitute approximately one-third of admissions and exits, they represent less than one-fourth of the prison population. Drug offenders have the highest percentages of sentences imposed (38.9%), admissions (41.6%), and releases (41.5%). With their comparably brief time served, however, drug offenders represent only 25.6% of the prison population.

The decline in the prison population over the past two years is directly related to increases in the volume of inmates sentenced to prison for Class 2, Class 3 or Class 4 property and drug offenses.


Time Served for Indeterminate Inmates

Most inmates are incarcerated with a determinate sentence, in which a predetermined release date is calculated. Inmates who committed an offense prior to 1978 have been incarcerated with an indeterminate sentence. These inmates are sentenced within a minimum and maximum range and are released following a decision made by the Prisoner Review Board or the Governor, or at the expiration of their sentence (see Appendix B). Table 7 illustrates the changes in this population from 1993 to 2002.

On December 31, 2002 there were 351 inmates in prison who were serving an indeterminate sentence. Just over 83% of these inmates were incarcerated for Murder and another 10.8% for Class X offenses. Another 17 inmates were incarcerated with Class 1 offenses, two inmates with Class 2 felonies, one with a Class 3 felony, and one with a Class 4 offense. These inmates had served an average of over 25 years. Few indeterminate inmates are released each year, and due to the seriousness of their crimes, most of the remaining indeterminate offenders will stay in prison for many years.



Inmates with a Sentence of Life, Death, or Sexually Dangerous Person

The number of inmates who will never be released is also growing, with 1,433 incarcerated on December 31, 2002. The number of inmates with a life sentence (1,135) continues to increase. The end-of-year condemned unit population rose by two in 2002, after falling by six inmates during 2001. In 2002 there were nine admissions to the condemned unit, while there were four inmates who died of natural causes, one that was reversed and remanded, and one that was resentenced to life. In addition, one inmate who was on the condemned unit count in Illinois was executed in the State of Ohio during 2002. The number of Sexually Dangerous Persons (SDPs) increased to 138 during 2002; SDPs can only be released by court order.

The average age of these 1,433 inmates (40.8 years) is nearly eight years older than the average age of other inmates in prison. Of the three groups of inmates, SDPs are the oldest, averaging 44.6 years of age. Inmates with death sentences are one year older on average than those with life sentences.



Guilty But Mentally Ill Inmates

It states in 720 ILCS 5/6-2 that a "person who, at the time of the commission of a criminal offense, was not insane but was suffering from a mental illness, is not relieved of criminal responsibility for his conduct and may be found guilty but mentally ill." Guilty but mentally ill inmates are incarcerated with IDOC.

The number of guilty but mentally ill inmates in the prison population at the end of December 2002 (147) decreased by 12 from one year earlier. This relatively large decline resulted from 37 releases of inmates who had been found guilty but mentally ill, with only 25 admissions during 2002. The end of 2002 population is the lowest in the last ten years.



Habitual Criminals

The number of offenders with a natural life sentence imposed under the Habitual Criminal statute (720 ILCS 5/33B-1) increased to 96 inmates during 2002. Habitual offenders have committed Class X crimes in separate instances on three occasions, whereupon commission of the third Class X offense the court must adjudge the offender as a habitual offender.

 

Habitual Child Sex Offenders

The total number of habitual child sex offenders and child sex offenders in prison continued to decrease during 2002. The volume of these child sex offenders fell to 266 at the end of 2002, which is about half the size of this population three years earlier.

This population underwent moderate growth after 1989. However, as a result of a change in the statute, a greater number of these inmates had been sentenced to prison through 1995. Enacted in January 1993, 730 ILCS 150/1 now requires that these offenders be designated a Child Sex Offender (CSO) on the first offense. Previously, the designation was not made until the second or subsequent offense.

The decline in the number of CSOs in the prison population is attributed to the procurement of more detailed information relating to the offense. Since 1995, States Attorneys have been providing better victim data, and, consequently, Record Office staff are able to identify only those inmates who meet the criteria under the Habitual Child Sex Offender Registration Act.



Truth in Sentencing

In August 1995, Truth in Sentencing legislation was enacted (730 ILCS 5/3-6-3 (a)(2)) under Public Act 89-404. However, this law was declared unconstitutional by the Illinois Supreme Court on January 22, 1999. Anticipating this decision, Public Act 90-593 became effective on June 19, 1998, reenacting the original Truth in Sentencing provisions.

According to this statute, offenders who commit First Degree Murder must serve 100% of the sentence imposed by the court. A second provision lists twelve serious violent offenses that require inmates to serve 85% of their sentences. A third category of five violent offenses where the enumerated offense resulted in great bodily harm to a victim also requires inmates to serve 85% of their sentences. In three additional categories, i.e., where the circumstances of Reckless Homicide while under the Influence of Alcohol or any Other Drugs, Aggravated Battery or Aggravated Discharge of a Machine Gun or a Firearm Equipped with a Device used for Silencing the Report of a Firearm, and Aggravated Arson, inmates may be required to serve 85% of their sentences. The Truth in Sentencing provisions are described in Appendix B.

Beginning in late 1998, IDOC began to admit offenders sentenced under this new legislation. The end-of-year 2002 prison population included 3,086 inmates sentenced under the Truth in Sentencing statute. Of these inmates, 710 committed First Degree Murder and will serve 100% of their sentences. The majority of inmates sentenced under Truth in Sentencing have been sentenced under the mandatory 85% statute, with 2,087 inmates having been sentenced. Most of the inmates sentenced under this section of the statute were admitted for sexually assaultive offenses (Class X Predatory Criminal Sexual Assault of a Child, Class X Aggravated Criminal Sexual Assault, and Class 1 Criminal Sexual Assault). Attempted Murder and battery offenses were also prevalent.

Another 146 inmates committed an offense for which the sentencing judge determined that great bodily harm was inflicted upon the victim. Most of these were the Class X offenses of Home Invasion and Armed Robbery. These inmates are also required to serve 85% of their sentences. In addition, 137 inmates committed Reckless Homicide and six inmates committed Aggravated Arson for which the sentencing judge determined that the circumstances warranted the inmates serve 85% of their sentences.

The majority of inmates admitted to prison under Truth in Sentencing have been admitted since 2000. A total of 720 inmates were admitted during 2000, another 945 were admitted in 2001, and 1,033 were admitted in 2002. Only 55 Truth in Sentencing cases were released during 2002; consequently, the population impact of Public Act 90-593 will not be felt until additional data are available for Truth in Sentencing inmates who will serve more time than they otherwise would have served if the customary determinate sentence had been imposed. A more comprehensive analysis will be conducted in future reports as more offenders are released under this Truth in Sentencing statute.


Download 2002 Statistical Presentation in PDF form. (934k)

2002 Statistical Presentation

Letter from the Director
Foreword
Acknowledgments
Introduction
PART 1: Impact on the Population

Summary

Prison Population

Violent Offenders, Drug Offenders and Females in the Prison Population

Impact of Determinate Sentencing

Prison Population by Offense Type

Impact of Determinate Sentencing on Length of Stay

Time Served and Projected Time to Serve for Determinate Cases

Sentences Imposed, Admissions, Exits, and Population by Offense Type

Time Served for Indeterminate Inmates

Inmates with a Sentence of Life, Death, or Sexually Dangerous Person

Guilty But Mentally Ill Inmates

Habitual Criminals

Habitual Child Sex Offenders

Truth in Sentencing

PART 2: Length of Stay
Summary
Length of Stay in Years for Inmates Released
Length of Stay in Years by Offense Class for Inmates Released
Length of Stay in Years by Offense Type for Inmates Released
Length of Stay in Years for Determinate Cases
Length of Stay in Years for Indeterminate Cases
Length of Stay in Years for Determinate Cases by Selected Offenses
Length of Stay in Years for Indeterminate Cases by Selected Offenses
Length of Stay for Most Fequent 25 Offenses
Length of Stay for Impact Incarceration Program Graduates and Comparison Group
Recidivism Rates
PART 3: Sentences Imposed
Summary
Average Determinate Sentences Imposed
Distribution of Determinate Sentences Imposed
Average Sentence Imposed by Offense Class
Sentences Imposed and Average Sentence Imposed by Offense Class
Average Sentence Imposed for Selected Offenses
Average Sentence Imposed by Offense Type
Indeterminate Sentences Imposed
Cumulative Average Sentence Imposed: Indeterminate and Determinate Cases
Sentences Imposed: Less Than Minimum and Extended Sentences
Consecutive Sentences
Drug Sentences Imposed
Drug Offense Admissions
Most Fequent Sentences Imposed
Truth in Sentencing Admissions
Mean Sentences Imposed in Years by Judicial Circuit, Judicial District, and Region
Appendix A
Appendix B
General Methodology
Truth in Sentencing Statue 730 ILCS 5/3-6-3 (a)(2)
Part I
Impact on the Population
Part II
Length of Stay
Part III
Sentences Imposed
Copyright © 2002 IDOC IDOC Privacy Information | Illinois Privacy Information | Kids Privacy | Web Accessibility | IDOC Webmaster