www.idoc.state.il.us
S.A. Godinez, Director

Pat Quinn, Governor

Agency Links Skip to Content

Director
IDOC Overview
IDOC Annual Report
Inmate Search
Facilities
Visitation Rules
FAQ
Attorney FAQ
Contact Us
Jobs @ IDOC
Reports & Stats

Eligibility Criteria Supervised Electronic Detention

MGT/SMGT Impact List

Sex Registrant Search
Community Notification of Inmate Early Release
IDOC News
Industries
Victim Services
Wanted Fugitives
IDOC Advisory Board
Adult Redeploy IL Oversight Board
RANA Task Force
Employee Cost - Savings Suggestion Program
Employee Benefits Information
Illinois Department of Juvenile Justice
IDOC Home
Illinois Home
[Search Tips]

IIP Inmate Profile

diagonal image

All of the 1 02 Illinois counties have recommended inmates to the IIP. Cook County has sent most of the IIP candidates, having recommended 66.3% of the 30,456 candidates. The collar counties of DuPage, Kane, Lake, McHenry, and Will supplied another 8.6%, and 25.1% have been sentenced from the remaining Illinois counties. Statewide, 26.7% IIP candidates have been denied, with the Cook County denial rate slightly higher than the rest of the state.

The typical IIP inmate is 22 years of age, black, male, with an eleventh grade education and a substance abuse history. He has been convicted of a Class 1 or Class 2 property or drug offense with an average sentence of 4.2 years. Table 3 compares the profiles of inmates selected for the IIP and those eligible offenders who have been denied or refused to participate.

The inmates who entered the program presented a demographic profile similar to the eligible inmates who were denied or refused participation. The principal differences were that participants were younger, and more likely to have no prior incarcerations than inmates who were recommended but did not take part in the program. Females have a higher denial rate (36.3%), primarily due to medical reasons.

Participants were more likely to have committed a Class 1 crime and/or a drug offense. Their average sentence was more than six months longer than for those inmates who were denied IIP admission. Shorter sentences for non-participants reflect that inmates with lower class offenses who received 1- or 2-year sentences have refused to participate because their time left to serve at admission is close to the time spent awaiting transfer and partaking in the IIP. Finally, an equal percentage of candidates who qualified under the expanded criteria were denied as participated in the IIP.

Profile of IIP Graduates

diagonal image

Since the first graduation on February 12, 1991, there have been 15,863 inmates who successfully completed the IIP. Graduates represent 72.4% of all inmates who have exited the IIP (see Figure 3).

The graduation rate remained higher for Hispanic (77.0%) and white inmates (75.8%) than for black inmates (70.5%). Females had a much lower graduation rate (65.7%) than males (72.7%). Graduation rates were highest, exceeding 77%, for IIP participants with a high school diploma, GED or advanced education. Graduates have been more educated and slightly older than program failures. Inmates from Cook County had the lowest graduation rates (71.4%) (see Table 3).

Among offense data, 75.2% of the participants sentenced for a drug offense have graduated, while graduation rates were below 70% for the other offense categories. The graduation rate was highest for the inmates with a Class 1 offense, decreasing as the offenses become less serious. Inmates with the shorter sentences had the lowest graduation rate; those in the 6- to 8-year range had the highest rates of successfully completing the program (82.7%). IIP participants who qualified under the expanded criteria had a higher graduation rate than the inmates who were accepted under the original criteria.

Profile of Program Failures

diagonal image

Other than graduating from the IIP, a participant may exit the program due to a disciplinary infraction, a program review hearing, or by quitting voluntarily (see Appendix A for an explanation of the disciplinary procedures). There have been 6,061 (27.6%) inmates who have left the program before completion. Voluntary dropouts have accounted for 63.5% of these cases (see Figure 4). To date there have been 3,851 inmates who voluntarily quit the IIP. This is 17.6% of the inmates who have exited the IIP (see Figure 3). There has been no significant increase in the proportion of inmates who voluntarily left after entering the program even though the option for inmates to refuse participation during reception and classification was eliminated.

As of June 30, 2003, there have been 2,210 cases that resulted in disciplinary termination from the IIP. This represents 10.1% of all inmates who have exited the IIP so far (see Figure 3). Of the failures, 1,077 (17.8%) involved program reviews resulting from accumulated infractions, while 1,133 (18.7%) resulted from major rule violations (see Figure 4).

Inmates who failed the IIP were more likely to be convicted of a property crime or a crime against a person than those inmates who graduated. They were also less educated and more likely to be sentenced in Cook County (see Table 3). Those inmates who have been involuntarily terminated from the program have been younger, by nearly one year, than those who voluntarily left the IIP or graduated; almost half were 17 to 19 years of age. Inmates who quit the program had shorter sentences than those who failed the program with a rule violation or program review, and were committed for more of the lower class offenses.

2003 IIP Annual Report

Download the PDF here. (194k)

Statistical Summary: June 30, 2003

Denials

IIP Inmate Profile

Profile of IIP Graduates

Profile of Program Failures

IIP Females

Post Release Data

Background

Methods

Findings

Additional Research

Cost Savings

Appendix A
Impact Incarceration Program Description

Introduction
Background
Purpose
Goals and Objectives
Overview
Selection Criteria
Screening Process
Training
Core Program
Substance Abuse Counseling
Education
Voluntary Removal
Discipline
Preparation for Release
Graduation
Post Release
Appendix B
IIP Process Flow
Appendix C
Aggregate Statstics Since Implementation
Appendix D
References
Copyright © 2002 IDOC IDOC Privacy Information | Illinois Privacy Information | Kids Privacy | Web Accessibility | IDOC Webmaster